I am a retired engineer that supports R/C hobbyists and students in my rural area. As a learning tool R/C aircraft are excellent. Aerodynamics, electronics, software, mechanical skills, group skills and more. I feel it
setting long range and FPV in the same category in the second to last question is not really a good idea. Long range is something where I would see remote ID as maybe neccessary. for
I’ve flown drones all my life and frankly, trying to enforce something like this hobby, at this magnitude, is absurd. It is just going to creat bigger issues trying to make everyone have remote ID.
Flying models too me has been a big part of my life since I was very young. The dream was always to do like in står wars flying through the woods or down the death
I fly for fun, never put anyone or anything in danger. Why won’t I be able to fly around my own house? These regulations are going to destroy so many people’s love for the hobby.
Remote ID should only be required for drones flying autonomously and where a pilot is not actively paying attention to the drone. Also it should be the responsibility of the hobbyist to stay out of
Flying is the number one activity that my son and I share. It allows us to spend time and bond with each other in ways no other activity does. It has also stimulated his interest
Hello, I’m a middle age male who as been flying remote control aircraft and flying rockets since I was a kid. I currently fly with my children and grand children who really enjoy model aircraft.
Flying, particularly fpv allows me to escape, briefly from the stresses of my life. Building and developing craft helps my confidence and skills to increase. I meet and work with some inspiring people involved in
It’s a good hobby and hurts no one. Either way I’m gonna send it. So don’t make me break the law.
its a hobby, like anything, it can be a danger if done recklessly, eg biking. commercial interests in limiting the hobby shouldnt dictate the law