It allows me to have fun and be free

My job is to design and build commercial heavy lift multirotors. Remote ID gets us closer to BVLOS and other things that make the commercial side of things much more effective. As a hobbyist, I build drones to fly FPV. The software and hardware I use at my job is the same that I use

I believe birds are more of a safety issue to the NASA than recreational aircraft.

Remote ID and registration requirements are not appropriate for FPV style drones. These are drones that are built and rebuilt constantly. Most responsible pilots look for remote uninhabited areas to try out new tricks and make videos. I think these new proposed requirements make sense for automated commercial delivery drones or long range drones. Airspace

Flying for me is a stress reliever. I can hang out at the flying field with a few buddies and just have a good time. I’ve been flying safely for the past 10 years and spent countless amounts of money on this hobby. Regulations would make everything I own pretty much worthless. I have already

I’ve been flying RC MODEL AIRCRAFT for decades. I have NEVER had and incident, always fly at designated flying sites, approved by the AMA. Let the AMA govern us, DO NOT lump fixed wing MODEL AIRCRAFT with multi-rotor “drones”. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME!!!!!

I fly with a group of people that manly fly FPV and usually at or below the tree line, sometime popping out and climbing 50ft above treeline. We are in no way posing any danger to anyone in the airspace. These new regulations are aimed toward commercial and high altitude aircraft and should not be

Been Flying R/C aircraft for 45 years. Sailplanes, GAS, Electric, and Drones. Most/All of my flying is line-of-site and under 400 foot altitude. I don’t believe a REMOTEID would benefit anyone with those restrictions. I have flown in the desert, on dry lake beds. Internet is spotty there. I do feel that remoteID could be